As long as you never stop using ms paint, like with your steins;gate posts (http://onewdesign.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/steinsgate-16-sadface.jpg?w=950), I’ll be happy.

I am the biggest victim of that sadly. It is always hard for me to come up with a snappy title (and one that express the post accurately), so I just go with the safe and bland approach. Hopefully, the content inside is not the same.

P.S. Interesting post titles sure is a rule that I have been wilfully violating for the past three years… will you read my Sword Mart on Limes 4 post, now that I changed the title? >_>

And as for your own blog, I actually didn’t notice that your imags were stream quality, I was really just implying the ones that are very pixelated with the watermark of the site in the corner (which I have seen). So you’re fine with what you’re doing.

Often people try to hard to sound like someone or to just sound differently from how they actually are, in cases like that, it’s really hard to be interested in the writer’s work. It just sounds insincere.

I guess I shouldn’t start making exceptions to my own comments, but if you notice my review posts, they tend to be an extremely straight forward title. I guess it’s true that most people would feel unsure on what you were actually writing with an ambiguous title for a review, especially since you say you cover all aspects of a series. Unless your review were to focus on one prominent aspect or theme, I wouldn’t really see any benefit of putting a more interesting title.